Saturday, April 14, 2007

Subliminal Messages


It seems that we haven't come across the topic of subliminal messages. We see these ads everyday wither we're just walking down the street or in a super market. But how do this relate to words and images? When I saw this advertisement, I definitely wasn't thinking about tonic water, but gin, vodka, and rum. (I'm not an alcoholic and do not promote alcoholism!) Also, the knife caught my attention, the way it's placed gave me an unpleasant feeling. The spilled water made me think of blood for some reason (Basic Instinct?). Feel free to comment!

(another) Rear Window

It didnt dawn on me seeing Disturbia that it has the exact same plot line as the classic "Rear Window" that we watched for class. What suprised me most about the movie is that it actually wasn't that bad for being a direct rip off of a classic. I don't want to spoil the movie for anyone who plans to see it but the ending has a different twist making for some good entertainment. I posted a link to the trailer for anyone who might be interested.

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

The 6 Steps according to Scott MCloud


1. Idea/ purpose
2. Form
3. Idiom
4. Structure
5. Craft
6. Surface

Friday, April 6, 2007

What the Six Steps Mean at Berklee

In UNDERSTANDING COMICS, Scott McCloud lays out the six steps of a complete creative process. McCloud demonstrates how an artist can gain an understanding of, and access each echelon over a long period of study, but also how these steps apply to each work of art. Clearly, one cannot be said to have mastered any form of art without full knowledge and utility of each of these steps, so I want to do a little comparison of some of the majors at Berklee to see which ones are the most complete by this model (and to reassure myself about my own selection of major) I'll start with a brief account of my own progress through the steps as a musician.

My story begins with my decision to start playing the bass guitar. I had been listening to Primus records, and one day decided, that I just had to learn to play that wacky stuff. I got a bass and began emulating the sounds I heard, learning by ear alone. I picked up a lot of nimble fingered licks and flashy slap bass, and thought I was really on to something. I had grazed step 6, the surface. Here my course meandered. I went directly to step 3 and tried to create my own idiom. (The fact that my initial inspiration was Primus should tell you that I was chiefly interested in sounding completely different than anyone else) This attempt had mixed results, because I wasn't going for a musical idiom, but for a bass guitar idiom. So though I thought I was breaking new ground, I was working on a tiny little patch of dirt. It didn't take me long to realize that there were less obvious, but more important aspects of playing the bass I would need to master to actually get any gigs, such as playing tastefully, and with consistent time. These just below the surface techniques represented step 5, the craft of playing bass. Soon, I began actually writing songs, and step 4, structure, became important. (I had also made an unconcious decision about step 2, form, but that had not yet occourred to me.) Musical notation and communication, song forms, and prosody all started to slowly manifest in my repertoire. Finally, I had some real room to experiment with idioms. At Berklee, I have managed to learn -indirectly until this class- about the importance of a concept/story/message as the foundation of a song. I have now used both steps 1, Idea/Purpose, and 2, Form, as the basis for my work. I have discovered that it is possible to write a pop song that is a comment about the art form itself (that is, beginning with step 2.) This has given me extraordinary freedom, becase if I can't summon a good Idea for a song, I can write the song just for the purpose of the song. Now this can't be done effectively if it is too obvious, but think about how we all created art projects based on a single concept of visual art. I could use the solipsism inherent in any story as the basis for a song, as a comment about the song, but It won't work if the lyrics are literally a discussion of the meaning of the term.

So what does this all mean for Berklee students in various majors? Well, I have chosen Songwriting as my major, and as I have shown, writing songs not only enables me to excercice all six steps, but demands that I use all of them to be truly succesfull. Having lyrics helps, because I can use actual words to state my purpose, but lyrics are not neccesary to convey a rich emotional message, or even to make a subtle comment about art. This makes me think that any of the writing majors must have the same depth of artistry. (with the possible exception of film scoring. Unless the artist has written his own movie, he has to deal with someone else's Idea/Purpose, and might be ultimately subject to a director's creative control)
MP&E majors concentrate mostly on surface, but must have a complete grasp of the structure, idiom, form, and purpose to do their job well. Educators can't teach what they don't know. The one major that seems to be the most difficult path to step 1 is performance. A performer who never writes any music can never get closer to the core of the apple than the idiom. However, the most revered musicians are those who are known as performers, but also write music based on an idea or form that that allows them to take their craft to new levels. John Coltrane writing "Giant Steps" Is a great example. No one thinks of Coltrane the composer, but "Giant Steps" is one of the boldest statements in art, about art. The weight of Coltrane's "commentary" is staggering, it gave us all a new concept of what music, and art in general are.

Having said all this, the more important point is that the best music is created by groups of people who specialize in different steps. Very few of us can be like Coltrane, the jack of all steps, and master of at least one, and even he didn't do it all by himself. Collaboration between performers, producers, writers, and bandleaders is the best way to cover the entire spectrum of creativity, and is uniquely musical.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Ipods

The article on Birders was a good one. It got me thinking in other ways of how electronics, including the internet, makes people more antisocial. I want to focus on ipods. I am a Male. I am 22 years old. I love women. I have a love-hate relationship with my ipod. When I don't want to be bothered on the train, or for a few minutes before class I throw on a couple of tunes and relax. But, how am I suppost to meet new people, chicks mostly, when it seems like every young person is ignoring the world and concentrating on that one song that they love. How many potential dates could I have gone one had that girl not had those little ear buds in. Probably zero, but maybe I would have had a chance or two.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

To Hell in a Technological Handbasket

Here is an article from The Boston Globe that explores the idea that "our reliance on the online universe can endanger the vital tool of narrative." What do you think?

Friday, March 16, 2007

I was thinking about the closing remark I made regarding art in my last post. I was generally saying that artists are distinguished (good) if they are able to convey an eternal emotion in their art. but am I allowed to say that? what constitutes GOOD art? is it good if it sparks controversy, if it does or does not call upon an emotion? is the art good because of the history behind the artist? i believe i was close in saying we must have faith in art and the direction art has taken, but must we have faith in that all art will be good? or that art IS good or bad? because afterall, we WILL NEVER have a standard of comparison. sorry guys if i turned any of you off with my last post! i do acknowledge the fact that art opinions are exactly that--opinions, but can we agree that as an audience, a lot falls on our shoulders and much is expected of us when it comes to enjoying art??